It was result of the accumulated discontent among the various Strata of the old Indian Society who suffered by the British Political conquest, by the new Economic forces and measures brought into operation by those conquests, and by the various social innovations introduced in the country by the British Government. It endangers the religion, honour, life and property of the Hindus and Muslims.
The revolt set off a remarkable series of events and became the basis of a court case that ultimately reached the U. The civil rights issues involved in the affair made it the most famous case to appear in American courts before the landmark Dred Scott decision of After a nightmarish voyage in which approximately a third of the captives died, the journey ended with the clandestine, nighttime entry of the ship into Cuba—in violation of the Anglo-Spanish treaties of and that made the African slave trade a capital crime.
The ship, named after the Spanish word for friendship, was a small black schooner built in Baltimore for the coastal slave trade.
It was to transport its human cargo miles to two plantations on another part of Cuba at Puerto Principe. They found them in boxes: Two sailors who were aboard disappeared in the melee and were probably drowned in a desperate attempt to swim the long distance to shore.
Instead of making it home, however, the former captives eventually ended up off the coast of New York. The two Spaniards deceived their captors by sailing back and forth in the Caribbean Sea, toward the sun during the day and, by the stars, back toward Havana at night, hoping for rescue by British anti-slave-trade patrol vessels.
When that failed, Ruiz and Montes took the schooner on a long and erratic trek northward up the Atlantic coast. He immediately dispatched an armed party who captured the men ashore and then boarded the vessel. They found a shocking sight: Gedney seized the vessel and cargo and reported the shocking episode to authorities in New London, Connecticut.
Only 43 of the Africans were still alive, including the four children. In addition to the one killed during the mutiny, nine had died of disease and exposure or from consuming medicine on board in an effort to quench their thirst.
The affair might have come to a quiet end at this point had it not been for a group of abolitionists.
Both those who advocated its practice and those who quietly condoned it by inaction deserved condemnation. Unless killed the tree will die. Tappan preached impromptu sermons to the mutineers, who were impressed by his sincerity though unable to understand his language.
He wrote detailed newspaper accounts of their daily activities in jail, always careful to emphasize their humanity and civilized backgrounds for a fascinated public, many of whom had never seen a black person.
At last the Amistad mutineers could tell their side of the story. Baldwin of Connecticut, who had a reputation as an eloquent defender of the weak and downtrodden. He argued that the ownership papers carried by Ruiz and Montes were fraudulent and that the blacks were not slaves indigenous to Cuba.
The case then entered the world of politics.
It posed such a serious problem for President Martin Van Buren that he decided to intervene. A public dispute over slavery would divide his Democratic party, which rested on a tenuous North-South alliance, and could cost him reelection to the presidency in Working through his secretary of state, slaveholder John Forsyth from Georgia, Van Buren sought to quietly solve the problem by complying with Spanish demands.
Van Buren also faced serious diplomatic issues. The White House position was transparently weak.
Officials refused to question the validity of the certificates of ownership, which had assigned Spanish names to each of the captives even though none of them spoke that language. Presidential spokesmen blandly asserted that the captives had been slaves in Cuba, despite the fact that the international slave trade had been outlawed some 20 years earlier and the children were no more than nine years old and spoke an African dialect.
The court proceedings opened on September 19,amid a carnival atmosphere in the state capitol building in Hartford, Connecticut. Issuance of the writ would recognize the Africans as persons with natural rights and thus undermine the claim by both the Spanish and American governments that the captives were property.
If the prosecution brought charges, the Africans would have the right of self-defense against unlawful captivity; if it filed no charges, they would go free.The rebellion is also known as India's First War of Independence, the Great Rebellion, the Indian Mutiny, the Revolt of , the Uprising of , the Sepoy Rebellion and the Sepoy Mutiny.
The Mutiny was a result of various grievances. Find an answer to your question write a short note on the revolt of /5(18).
In this video I've discussed about the Revolt of to enroll in courses, follow best educators, interact with the community and track your progress. Robin Hood is a legendary heroic outlaw originally depicted in English folklore and subsequently featured in literature and film.
According to legend, he was a highly skilled archer and rutadeltambor.com some versions of the legend he is depicted as being of noble birth, and having fought in the Crusades before returning to England to find his lands taken by the Sheriff.
The Indian Rebellion of was a major uprising in India during –58 against the rule of the British East India Company, which functioned as a sovereign power on behalf of the British Crown.   The event is known by many names, including the Sepoy Mutiny, the Indian Mutiny, the Great Rebellion, the Revolt of , the Indian.
Indian Rebellion of or revolt of ; A map of 'Northern India: the Revolt of ' showing six centres of rebellion including the principal ones: Meerut, Delhi, Cawnpore (), Lucknow, Jhansi, and Gwalior.