Audi used this in their Green Police Ads.
If this is degrading and inhumane. He was sentenced to 25 lashes "and that on the next Thursday Immediately after Lecture Bring back flogging fallacies stand upon the Pillory for The day is long past when the stocks had an honored place on the Boston Common, or when offenders were publicly flogged.
Now we practice a more enlightened, more humane way of disciplining wrongdoers: We lock them up in cages. Imprisonment has become our penalty of choice for almost every offense in the criminal code.
Commit murder; go to prison.
Sell cocaine; go to prison. Kite checks; go to prison. It is an all-purpose punishment, suitable -- or so it would seem -- for crimes violent and nonviolent, motivated by hate or by greed, plotted coldly or committed in a fit of passion. That represents a percent increase sinceand the number is climbing.
We cage criminals at a rate unsurpassed in the free world, but few of us believe that the criminal justice system is a success.
Crime is out of control, despite the deluded happy talk by some politicians about how "safe" cities have become. For most wrongdoers, the odds of being arrested, prosecuted, convicted, and incarcerated are reassuringly long.
Fifty-eight percent of all murders do not result in a prison term. Likewise 98 percent of all burglaries. Many states have gone on prison-building sprees, yet the penal system is choked to bursting.
To ease the pressure, nearly all convicted felons are released early -- or not locked up at all. To be sure, the cost to society of turning many inmates loose would be even higher. For tens of thousands of convicts, prison is a graduate school of criminal studies: They emerge more ruthless and savvy than when they entered.
And for many offenders, there is even a certain cachet to doing time -- a stint in prison becomes a sign of manhood, a status symbol.
But there would be no cachet in chaining a criminal to an outdoor post and flogging him. If young punks were horsewhipped in public after their first conviction, fewer of them would harden into lifelong felons.
Are we quite certain the Puritans have nothing to teach us about dealing with criminals? Of course, their crimes are not our crimes: We do not arrest blasphemers or adulterers, and only gun control fanatics would criminalize the sale of weapons to Indians.
They would criminalize the sale of weapons to anybody. Nor would the ordeal suffered by poor Joseph Gatchell -- the tongue "peirct through" with a hot poker -- be regarded today as anything less than torture. Instead of a prison term, why not sentence at least some criminals -- say, thieves and drunk drivers -- to a public whipping?
Why is it more brutal to flog a wrongdoer than to throw him in prison -- where the risk of being beaten, raped, or murdered is terrifyingly high? The Boston Globe reported in that more thanprison inmates are raped each year, usually to the indifference of the guards.
Perhaps the Puritans were more enlightened than we think, at least on the subject of punishment.The Islamic religion claims that the Qur’an, revealed allegedly by the angel Gabriel to the prophet Muhammad beginning in A.D., is the inspired and inerrant word of God.
"Bring Back Flogging" was published on February 20, in in the Boston Globe. In this essay, Jeff Jacoby describes the weak points of today's criminal justice system, and claims that flogging should be our option because it is a much quicker, cheaper, educational, and a /5(1).
Port Manteaux churns out silly new words when you feed it an idea or two. Enter a word (or two) above and you'll get back a bunch of portmanteaux created by jamming together words that are conceptually related to your inputs..
For example, enter "giraffe" and you'll get back . In this essay "Bring Back Flogging," the author Jeff Jacoby argues effectively that flogging can be a successful alternative to the prison that the U.S. uses for every offensive.
The author builds his argument using implied thesis statement, inductive logic, and serious stance toward his readers. Bring Back Flogging Fallacies. Bring Back Flogging This essay by Jeff Jacoby illustrates an authors use of ironic sarcasm otherwise known as satire to defend and illustrate his platform on his position.
Jacoby uses in this essay verbal irony (persuasion in the form of ridicule). In the irony of this sort there is a contrast between what is said and what is meant. It was from to that Maududi's "most important and influential" works were published, according to scholar Seyyed Vali rutadeltambor.com describes his role at the time as a "ideologue" rather than a journalist he was earlier, or the political activist he became after founding his party.